Vol. 2, Appendix H - LCG Resolution of Locally Preferred Alternative

This resolution was adopted in February 2001. Are there aspects of the agreement that have changed or should have changed since that time?

Vol. 2, Appendix G - Joint Cooperative Endeavor Agreement (JCEA) -LCG Corridor Preservation and Management Action Plan to Preserve the I-49 Alignment

Joint Cooperative Endeavor Agreement (JCEA) -LCG Corridor Preservation and Management Action Plan to Preserve the I-49 Alignment

Have the proposedPhase I studies been completed, and if yes, where is the report? Is this plan and agreement complete? How should plans presented here be updated? How must it be changed if alignment is altered?

CONTENTS

• Plan of Archaeological Investigations for the Selected Alternative of the I-49 Connector, Lafayette, Louisiana
• Unmarked Human Burial Recovery Plan
• Information Management System
• Joint Cooperative Endeavor Agreement

Vol 2: Appendix A - Plan & Profile Plates

The scanned EIS plates are in the Volume 2 downloadable file from the link on the home page of this site. You may find better/ clearer maps at the official Connector government web site
  http://lafayetteconnector.com/the-project/maps/

However, the original 2002 plates are the current final documents for review. If you find discrepancies with current conditions or online maps, please post a description of the discrepancy in the comments for this post.

2 ALTERNATIVES

How have the conditions changed that led to selection of the preferred alternative?

CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES

2.1 SELECTION OF REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES

2.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

    2.2.1 Types of Improvements

        a No-Build

        b Full Freeway 

    2.2.2 Alignment and Interchange Alternatives 

        a EA-1 Elevated

        b EA-1 Selected Overpasses

        c General Discussion of The RR Alternatives

        d RR-3 Elevated

        e RR-3 Selected Overpasses

        f RR-4 Elevated

        g RR-5 Elevated

    2.2.3 Basic Laneage and Traffic Operations

        a Basic Laneage

        b Traffic Operations

    2.2.4 Costs

2.3 ALTERNATIVES ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED STUDY

    2.3.1 Rejected Conceptual Highway Types

    2.3.2 Rejected Alignment and Interchange Alternatives

2.4 LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

    2.4.1 Alignment and Subaltematives

    2.4.2 Description of Subaltemative F Modified (MPO Subaltemative)

2.5 SELECTED ALTERNATIVE